Has a Lawyer in Anoka County Been Disciplined or Suspended? Here's How to Find Out

Are you curious to know if a lawyer in Anoka County has been officially disciplined or suspended from practicing law? In this article we'll discuss how to find out if an attorney has been officially disciplined or suspended from practicing law.

Has a Lawyer in Anoka County Been Disciplined or Suspended? Here's How to Find Out

Are you curious to know if a lawyer in Anoka County has been officially disciplined or suspended from practicing law? If so, you've come to the right place. In this article, we'll discuss how to find out if an attorney has been officially disciplined or suspended from practicing law. The first step is to visit the Office of Professional Lawyer Responsibility website. This site provides public disciplinary records of Minnesota licensed attorneys.

You can search for an attorney's profile and State Bar Court case search to uncover if they have been disciplined or suspended. In addition, you can request copies of an attorney's official disciplinary records. This is a great way to get detailed information about any disciplinary action taken against an attorney. For example, let's take a look at the case of Robert Munns, a Minnesota State Attorney.

The Director of the Office of Professional Attorneys Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action against him. After hearing the case, the arbitrator recommended that he be suspended for three years and that the suspension be suspended subject to certain conditions. The arbitrator determined that Munns' failure to file income tax returns for the years 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, and 1985 constituted a serious misdemeanor and would normally justify the suspension. However, they also determined that his pattern of misconduct had been stopped through psychiatric treatment and, with continued treatment and appropriate aftercare, was unlikely to be repeated. The arbitrator concluded that a minor sanction was appropriate because of Munns' psychological illness, his age, reputation, professional capacity, and the circumstances surrounding the dissolution of his marriage. The Director ordered a transcript in accordance with Rule 14 of the Regulations on the Professional Responsibility of Lawyers. The Director agreed that Munns' misconduct justified the suspension but questioned the arbitrator's conclusion that his psychological problem constituted a mitigating factor that justified a lesser penalty than the suspension. The court ultimately determined discipline by weighing the nature of the misconduct, the cumulative weight of the violation of the disciplinary rule, the harm to the public, and the harm to the legal profession.

In this case, they attached great importance to the recommendation of the arbitrator but ultimately decided that Munns' misconduct alone justified suspension. However, they also took into account his psychological problems as a mitigating factor. When an attorney raises psychological disability as a mitigating factor, they must demonstrate the existence of a serious psychological problem, that it was the cause of their misconduct, that they are undergoing treatment and making progress towards recovery from it, that it has stopped their misbehavior, and that it is not likely to be repeated. In this case, Munns was able to demonstrate all these criteria through clear and convincing evidence. As a result, he was only suspended for two years instead of three. In conclusion, if you're looking for information on whether an attorney in Anoka County has been disciplined or suspended from practicing law, you can visit the Office of Professional Lawyer Responsibility website or request copies of their official disciplinary records. This will provide you with detailed information about any disciplinary action taken against them.

Leave Message

All fileds with * are required